University of Texas Rio Grande Valley
EDINBURG, TEXAS
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
CHAPEL HILL, NC
COLLEGE COUNCIL · ATLAS · US UNIVERSITIES

Texas Rio Grande Valley vs North Carolina - US university comparison

University of Texas Rio Grande Valley
TEXAS RIO GRANDE VALLEY
Edinburg, Texas
World rank · ARWU#801-900
Acceptance94.2%
Median SAT985
Graduation rate50.9%
Median earnings · 10 yrs$50K
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
NORTH CAROLINA
Chapel Hill, NC
World rank · ARWU#35
Acceptance15.34%
Median SAT1470
Graduation rate91.2%
Median earnings · 10 yrs$72K
🔒 UNDERGRADUATE 🔒 GRADUATE

KEY DATA

University of Texas Rio Grande Valley University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
#801-900 World rank · ARWU #35
- Rank · THE #70
94.2% Acceptance rate 15.34%
985 Median SAT 1470
50.9% Graduation rate 91.2%
31,864 Enrollment 32,680

HEAD-TO-HEAD STATISTICS

94.2% Acceptance rate 15.34%
55.4% Yield rate 45.5%
985 Median SAT 1470
- Avg. GPA 4.49
12,137 Number of applications 66,535
1.7% Int'l students 6.4%
$50K Median earnings · 10 yrs $72K
$29K Bottom 25% earnings · 10 yrs $48K
$67K Top 25% earnings · 10 yrs $112K
50.9% Graduation rate 91.2%
78.9% Retention rate 96.6%
$12,950 Median debt $14,000
$22,287 Tuition · year $45,228
$11,242 Avg. aid package $20,705
72% % of need met 100%
$14,589 Avg. graduate debt $20,382
- Application fee $85
$6,258 Avg. int'l aid -
At a glance
North Carolina leads in 7 of 11 measured metrics
Acceptance94.2% vs 15.34%
Tuition$22,287 vs $45,228
Aid$11,242 vs $20,705

The verdict, from the data

Texas Rio Grande Valley accepts most of the applications it receives (94.2%), while North Carolina turns away the overwhelming majority (15.3%).

North Carolina reports no financial aid for international students, while Texas Rio Grande Valley awards them $6,258 on average. For an applicant from outside the US that is usually the most important difference on this page.

On paper the cheaper option is Texas Rio Grande Valley: $22,287 against $45,228, which is $22,941 less a year.

The higher median salary ten years after enrolment belongs to North Carolina: $72K against $50K.

These numbers describe the cohorts already enrolled, not your chances; treat them as a starting point rather than a forecast.

Every sentence above comes from a field we hold in canonical. Where the data is missing, or the gap is small enough to be noise, the sentence simply does not appear.

EXPERT TAKE

North Carolina is the more selective of the two (15.34% vs 94.2% acceptance). North Carolina ranks higher in the ARWU world research ranking (#801-900 vs #35). North Carolina graduates earn a higher median 10 years after enrollment ($72K vs $50K). Texas Rio Grande Valley has lower sticker-price tuition ($22,287 vs $45,228 per year).

Both universities have complete, comparable data in canonical - the choice should come down to fit (campus culture, major, aid package) alongside the differences visible in the numbers below.

Choose Texas Rio Grande Valley for: lower tuition, lower graduate debt.

Choose North Carolina for: a higher world ranking, higher selectivity, higher graduate earnings.

College Council Atlas analysis · IPEDS / College Scorecard CDS 2024-25, ARWU 2024.

BY THE NUMBERS

Admissions

North Carolina is more selective (15.34% vs 94.2% acceptance); North Carolina has a higher median SAT (1470 vs 985).

Graduate outcomes

North Carolina graduates earn a higher median 10 years after enrollment ($72K vs $50K); North Carolina has a higher 6-year graduation rate (91.2% vs 50.9%).

Cost and aid

Texas Rio Grande Valley has lower sticker-price tuition ($22,287 vs $45,228); North Carolina offers a larger average aid package ($20,705 vs $11,242).

VALUE LANDSCAPE

$35k$76k$117k$158k$11k$35k$59k$83kTexas Rio Grande ValleyNorth Carolina TUITION · YEAR → MEDIAN EARNINGS · 10 YRS →
Each dot is a comparable US university; Texas Rio Grande Valley and North Carolina highlighted. Up and to the left = better value ratio.

FULL DATA TABLE

Metric Texas Rio Grande Valley North Carolina
World rank · ARWU#801-900#35
Rank · THE-#70
Acceptance rate94.2%15.34%
Yield rate55.4%45.5%
Median SAT9851470
Avg. GPA-4.49
Number of applications12,13766,535
International students1.7%6.4%
Median earnings · 10 yrs$50K$72K
Bottom 25% earnings · 10 yrs$29K$48K
Top 25% earnings · 10 yrs$67K$112K
Graduation rate50.9%91.2%
Retention rate78.9%96.6%
Median debt$12,950$14,000
Tuition · year$22,287$45,228
Avg. aid package$11,242$20,705
% of need met72%100%
Avg. graduate debt$14,589$20,382
Application fee-$85
Enrollment31,86432,680

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Is it harder to get into Texas Rio Grande Valley or North Carolina?

It's harder to get into North Carolina. Texas Rio Grande Valley accepts 94.2% of applicants, while North Carolina accepts 15.34%.

Do Texas Rio Grande Valley or North Carolina graduates earn more?

North Carolina graduates earn more: the median 10 years after enrollment is $72K vs $50K.

How much is tuition at Texas Rio Grande Valley vs North Carolina?

Sticker-price tuition is $22,287 per year at Texas Rio Grande Valley and $45,228 per year at North Carolina.

What SAT score do you need for Texas Rio Grande Valley or North Carolina?

The median admitted SAT score is 985 at Texas Rio Grande Valley and 1470 at North Carolina; aim for these values or higher to be competitive.

Which university ranks higher - Texas Rio Grande Valley or North Carolina?

North Carolina ranks higher in the ARWU world ranking: #801-900 for Texas Rio Grande Valley vs #35 for North Carolina.

Which university offers more financial aid - Texas Rio Grande Valley or North Carolina?

The average aid package is $11,242 at Texas Rio Grande Valley and $20,705 at North Carolina.

Compare Texas Rio Grande Valley with
Highest-ranked in ARWU. Click "↻ Change university" in the cards above to choose from all 47 universities (+35).
All metrics come 100% from College Council Atlas (canonical) - admissions, SAT, GPA, graduate outcomes, financial aid and costs from IPEDS / College Scorecard CDS 2024-25; rankings from ARWU 2024 and THE 2025. Zero manual fields. "-" = not yet in canonical.