Skip to content
Dual-Track Recruitment Analysis: Architecture and Track & Field in the USA | College Council
Study in the USA 3 min read

Dual-Track Recruitment Analysis: Architecture and Track & Field in the USA

An in-depth analysis of combining architecture studies with track & field at US universities. Covers NCAA sports programs, scholarships, and potential career paths for international students.

Dual-Track Recruitment Analysis: Architecture and Track & Field in the USA

Dual-Track Recruitment Analysis (Architecture B.Arch and Track & Field) for an International Female Applicant in the USA

About This Report

This detailed report presents a comprehensive strategic analysis of universities in the United States for an international undergraduate applicant, combining:

  • Academic Program: A rigorous, accredited Architecture (B.Arch) program at the undergraduate level
  • Sport: Intercollegiate-level (NCAA/NAIA) track & field training in middle-distance running

Analysis Contents

The report covers:

  1. Applicant Profile - academic and athletic requirements
  2. Analysis Methodology - key market constraints
  3. University Categories:
    • Dream School (High-Reach D1)
    • Strong Target Schools for a 2:17.50 level (Scenario A)
    • Realistic Options for a 2:22.00 level (Scenario B)
  4. Comparative Analysis - strategic recommendations
  5. Detailed University Information:
    • Cal Poly SLO
    • Cal Poly Pomona
    • Illinois Institute of Technology (IIT)
    • Pratt Institute
    • And others

Access the Full Report

You can download or view the full report in PDF format below:

📄 Full PDF Report

The report contains 16 pages of detailed analysis with comparative tables, TFRRS athletic data, and financial recommendations.

Document Preview

Key Findings

The report identifies four main options for the applicant, representing three different strategic models:

1. D1 Model (Cal Poly SLO) - Sports Priority

  • Highest level of athletic competition in Division 1
  • Funding primarily dependent on an athletic performance of 2:17.50
  • Financially risky for Scenario B

2. D2 Model (Cal Poly Pomona) - Balance Priority

  • Best option utilizing both athletic and academic achievements
  • Unique rules for “scholarship stacking” in NCAA D2, allowing students to combine athletic scholarships with academic aid.
  • Excellent B.Arch program and competitive athletic level

3. D3 Model (IIT / Pratt) - Academics Priority

  • Safest financial path
  • Guaranteed high academic scholarships
  • Athletics at a lower competitive level

Contact Us

If you have questions about this analysis or would like more information about the US college application process, please contact us.

Oceń artykuł:

4.8 /5

Średnia 4.8/5 na podstawie 79 opinii.

Back to blog

Book a free consultation

Contact